When we talk about the importance of sound in film, someone often says, in an attempt to bolster sound’s case, “What Would A Film Be Without Sound?”

Despite its good intentions I find statements like this to be insulting to sound.  In a strange way they legitimize sound’s subordinate status. If you really believe sound should have equal status with the other creative crafts, then asking that question should be considered just as bizarre as asking “What would films be without visuals?”

Anyway, being necessary or even useful doesn’t automatically make it artistically crucial, which is what we’re really talking about.  After all, the apparatus in the image pictured here is extremely useful too, but that doesn’t make it artistically important.

Right?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s